I am going to recommend this comic to our buddy Phil. https://psylockescans.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/because-she-is-a-little-girl-i-am-excited-sexually-chapter-1/
I want to look at manicprovost's URL, but the c/p hijack for comment threading now makes that impossible without dropping it into another document to strip the HTML.
Any way to force the commenting system to automagically recognize URLs and turn them into links? Alternately, can we get Malwyn to start a training program to get the VFM to write proper links instead of just dumping URLs everywhere?
Or more correctly I should say "without editing the HTML off"; I can do that by c/ping to the comment window, of course, but I can't drop it into my address bar as-is.
And Emacs is so much better than vi. Except for those times that only ed will do.
Cee said: but I can't drop it into my address bar as-is.
On Linux, if you just select text, then click the middle mouse button (which pastes the most recent selection, which might not be the same as the contents of the clipboard), it pastes without automatthew's HTML-wrapping hack.
@ cglasgow99: Star Trek was able to have a crossover with X-Men. Clearly, it's balanced and Star Wars is overpowered. Of course, DC is so ridiculous that it would kick Star Wars's ass with one hand tied behind its back (not that anything but the Lasso of Truth could bind it anyway).
that one worked from chrome, when I use Iron I get the one with checkboxes, blurry images, and when it gets to the part to past in some code in the blank box, the blank box is already filled, and I can't ever publish.
It's too bad the BIG BLACK ANGLICISM-FOR-ROOSTER crapflood today couldn't have been redirected here— that firehose might have pushed this page to the 201 comments that automatthew seems to want on this page for testing purposes, all in one swell foop.
Regarding the discussion of pseudonymity vs. sockpuppetry on http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/09/doxxing-and-outing-is-bad.html :
I take quite a dim view of the (intentional) use of multiple identities within a single community, but it might be okay if those identities are conscientiously not used to discuss the same topics. (Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry was quite well thought-out the last time I thought I might care enough about WP to learn about its policies.)
But there are a few exceptions in cases where there is obviously no intent to deceive, e.g. when necessary as the gag of a joke.
LurkingPuppy @28: "I take quite a dim view of the (intentional) use of multiple identities within a single community, but it might be okay if those identities are conscientiously not used to discuss the same topics."
I do occasionally use different identities on the VP blog, including one-offs used for sarcasm or humor, but I only have one other besides this which I use on a semi-regular basis. And as you suggested, the other has a very specific purpose.
Even then, I ensure that I don't use them both in the same post (which is the most damning aspect of sockpuppetry), and I intentionally embed a tell (not so obvious as Idle ----, but distinctive nonetheless) so that the observant will know the other is me.
As far as linking to comments goes, I don't understand why you don't use the mechanism which is already provided, via the comment permalink (example goes to current comment 1).
If the prospect of building href tags manually is too daunting for some (most?) people, perhaps modifying your current helper system would suffice. When the comment is submitted using the @nn, the nn could be traced to the Blogger permalink, which is used to replace the @nn placeholder.
This also has the added benefit of not pointing back to an incorrect comment if the number changes.
WaterBoy said: When the comment is submitted using the @nn, the nn could be traced to the Blogger permalink,
But he can't do anything at the time that comments are submitted. The @ hack is purely client-side JavaScript. (And so is the add-HTML-tags-on-copy feature on this test blog.)
WaterBoy said: When the comment is submitted using the @nn, the nn could be traced to the Blogger permalink, which is used to replace the @nn placeholder.
That's sort of where it's headed, I think, although LurkingPuppy is right, nothing can be done inside the comment box. Any manipulation, like what's done here with the copy/pasting, has to be done before the pasting.
The other problem with that is cross-page linking when a post spans multiple pages of comments, and it's not possible for the link-creating/linking code on one page to find the permalink on another page. But I have some ideas about that which may work around it.
Lurking Puppy @33: "The @ hack is purely client-side JavaScript."
I see.
"(And so is the add-HTML-tags-on-copy feature on this test blog.)"
...which doesn't work for me, BTW -- it's why I'm still using my standard comment format.
However, if it's possible to hijack the copy-paste feature for comment text, couldn't it also be used for copy-pasting the permalink URL? On IE, I need only right-click on the permalink and select 'Copy shortcut' to get it on the clipboard. It seems like the same client-side script could similarly be used to create the HTML tag for an href around it when I paste it, couldn't it?
Cail Corishev @34: "The other problem with that is cross-page linking when a post spans multiple pages of comments, and it's not possible for the link-creating/linking code on one page to find the permalink on another page."
See above. In short, the script wouldn't need to find the permalink as the user would already provide it via copy-paste.
The only difference between the HTML created by the @ tag and the permalink is below (using your comment #34):
The string is the same except for the last component. Creating it in the script should be almost the same; only the reference method would need to change. It works on multi-page comments, and it doesn't back-reference incorrect comments when previous posts are deleted.
The only question is what happens if the permalink-referenced comment is itself deleted...? I suspect it would go to the top of the page, but not sure.
If y'all have been up and down and all around on the permalink angle already, feel free to tell me to shut up. It won't hurt my fee-fees....
FYI, noticed a side effect of the copy/paste hijack - trying to copy URLs and pasting them gets completely borked.
Yeah, people should just use html tags to link; palemoon and firefox have the ability to open pages from the highlighted URL. But it's still an unhappy surprise.
SirHamster (#201) wrote:Yeah, people should just use html tags to link; palemoon and firefox have the ability to open pages from the highlighted URL. But it's still an unhappy surprise.
Do it work?
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted. DO NOT RESPOND TO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. You will be punished. Rules of the blog
Current Fiction: The Baron in the Trees, Italo Calvino Current Non-Fiction: The Meaning of Human Existence, EO Wilson Current Editing: Faraway Wars: Embers of Empire Current Writing: A Sea of Skulls (EE)
The Sorrows of Young Werther, JW von Goethe Black Sun Rising, CS Friedman When True Night Falls, CS Friedman Crown of Shadows, CS Friedman The Cutting Edge, Dave Duncan Upland Outlaws, Dave Duncan The Stricken Field, Dave Duncan Starship Liberator, BV Larson & David VanDyke Rocky Mountain Retribution, Peter Grant The Cleopatra Crisis, Simon Hawke The Magic Casement, Dave Duncan Faery Lands Forlorn, Dave Duncan Perilous Seas, Dave Duncan The Byzantine Empire, Charles Oman Corrosion, Johan Kalsi The Six-Gun Solution, Simon Hawke The Last Wish, Andrzej Sapkowski Three Hearts and Three Lions, Poul Anderson No Gods, Only Daimons, Kai Wai Cheah Blood of Elves, Andrzej Sapkowski Baptism of Fire, Andrzej Sapkowski Young Man's War, Rod Walker Dwellers in the Mirage, Abraham Merritt Battleship Indomitable, David VanDyke & BV Larson City of Corpses, John C. Wright Jerusalem, Alan Moore Men Without Women, Haruki Murakami The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise, Dario Fernandez-Morera Galaxy's Edge: Legionnaire, Jason Anspach & Nick Cole Face in the Abyss, Abraham Merritt Dwellers in the Mirage, Abraham Merritt Can We Avoid Another Financial Crisis?, Steve Keen The Lawdog Files, Lawdog Seven Footprints to Satan, Abraham Merritt Complete Short Stories, Abraham Merritt Galaxy's Edge: Galactic Outlaws, Jason Anspach & Nick Cole Young Man's War, Rod Walker Spring Snow, Yukio Mishima Runaway Horses, Yukio Mishima The Promethean, Owen Stanley Temple of Dawn, Yukio Mishima The Decay of the Angel, Yukio Mishima Death in Midsummer, Yukio Mishima Dangerous, Milo Yiannopoulos The Fifth Head of Cerberus, Gene Wolfe Sanshiro, Natsume Soseki 1Q84, Haruki Murakami Hooking Up, Tom Wolfe Hellstrom's Hive, Frank Herbert The Last Closet, Moira Greyland The Ember War, Richard Fox
39 Comments:
RUSH is gay !!
Um, I can't think of anything to say but I really like seeing my word in print & stuff.
Star Wars would totally kick Star Trek's ass. *g*
Is this a brialliant secret ploy by double agent minion to syphon off attention from Vox's blog...it just might work on me.
(spelling error left on purpose)
Also, leave Anonymous comments if you wish. I have secret plans and clever tricks in mind for dealing with them.
automatthew is evil, mean, nasty, and also smells bad.
...The hell? Is this Phil Sandifer's crawl space?
Why does Anonymous remain an option if its use is verboten?
Because Blogger is stupid and inflexible.
If Vox disables Anonymous commenting, that also disables the Name/URL function. He's done that at Alpha Game Plan, but does not want to do that at VP.
Blogger's commenting system is super retarded.
I am going to recommend this comic to our buddy Phil.
https://psylockescans.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/because-she-is-a-little-girl-i-am-excited-sexually-chapter-1/
I want to look at manicprovost's URL, but the c/p hijack for comment threading now makes that impossible without dropping it into another document to strip the HTML.
Any way to force the commenting system to automagically recognize URLs and turn them into links? Alternately, can we get Malwyn to start a training program to get the VFM to write proper links instead of just dumping URLs everywhere?
Or more correctly I should say "without editing the HTML off"; I can do that by c/ping to the comment window, of course, but I can't drop it into my address bar as-is.
Glock Rules.
I had to break up with my girlfriend yesterday. It was difficult but thankfully all that other shit was going on and it softened the blow a bit.
VFM #0209* said:
Glock Rules.
And Emacs is so much better than vi. Except for those times that only ed will do.
Cee said:
but I can't drop it into my address bar as-is.
On Linux, if you just select text, then click the middle mouse button (which pastes the most recent selection, which might not be the same as the contents of the clipboard), it pastes without automatthew's HTML-wrapping hack.
I think I'm gonna like this blog.
But automagical linkification of URLs would certainly make things easier for folks with ‘mobile devices’ (i.e. touchscreen toys).
"Because Blogger is stupid and inflexible."
"Blogger's commenting system is super retarded."
I'm not retarded you are.
Brady has been vindicated!
@ cglasgow99: Star Trek was able to have a crossover with X-Men. Clearly, it's balanced and Star Wars is overpowered. Of course, DC is so ridiculous that it would kick Star Wars's ass with one hand tied behind its back (not that anything but the Lasso of Truth could bind it anyway).
captcha test, not liking me lately
that one worked from chrome, when I use Iron I get the one with checkboxes, blurry images, and when it gets to the part to past in some code in the blank box, the blank box is already filled, and I can't ever publish.
wtf?!?!?
Testing a link to a comment in a different thread, which seemed to get it spammed when I tried it previously.
Might not have the same issue because this one is cross-blog, but I'm still curious to see what happens.
Now testing a link to a comment in this thread, to see if there's any difference.
Both of them remained. If there's an issue with certain links in Blogger, it's apparently blog-specific....maybe based on spam rules?
I want as many comments as possible, for use in testing improvements. [tags added manually]
So the magic doesn't (currently) work for copies from the post itself, only copies from other comments.
Maybe it'll work tomorrow, or next week.
It's too bad the BIG BLACK ANGLICISM-FOR-ROOSTER crapflood today couldn't have been redirected here— that firehose might have pushed this page to the 201 comments that automatthew seems to want on this page for testing purposes, all in one swell foop.
Regarding the discussion of pseudonymity vs. sockpuppetry on http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/09/doxxing-and-outing-is-bad.html :
I take quite a dim view of the (intentional) use of multiple identities within a single community, but it might be okay if those identities are conscientiously not used to discuss the same topics. (Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry was quite well thought-out the last time I thought I might care enough about WP to learn about its policies.)
But there are a few exceptions in cases where there is obviously no intent to deceive, e.g. when necessary as the gag of a joke.
LurkingPuppy said:
but it might be okay if those identities are conscientiously not used to discuss the same topics.
Nuh-uh! All pseudonyms are sockpuppets!
Stuffed Goldtoe said:
Nuh-uh! All pseudonyms are sockpuppets!
I totally 100% agree with you, Goldtoe! And I think we're clearly in the majority!
LurkingPuppy @28: "I take quite a dim view of the (intentional) use of multiple identities within a single community, but it might be okay if those identities are conscientiously not used to discuss the same topics."
I do occasionally use different identities on the VP blog, including one-offs used for sarcasm or humor, but I only have one other besides this which I use on a semi-regular basis. And as you suggested, the other has a very specific purpose.
Even then, I ensure that I don't use them both in the same post (which is the most damning aspect of sockpuppetry), and I intentionally embed a tell (not so obvious as Idle ----, but distinctive nonetheless) so that the observant will know the other is me.
@ automatthew
As far as linking to comments goes, I don't understand why you don't use the mechanism which is already provided, via the comment permalink (example goes to current comment 1).
If the prospect of building href tags manually is too daunting for some (most?) people, perhaps modifying your current helper system would suffice. When the comment is submitted using the @nn, the nn could be traced to the Blogger permalink, which is used to replace the @nn placeholder.
This also has the added benefit of not pointing back to an incorrect comment if the number changes.
Just a thought....
WaterBoy said:
When the comment is submitted using the @nn, the nn could be traced to the Blogger permalink,
But he can't do anything at the time that comments are submitted. The @ hack is purely client-side JavaScript. (And so is the add-HTML-tags-on-copy feature on this test blog.)
WaterBoy said:
When the comment is submitted using the @nn, the nn could be traced to the Blogger permalink, which is used to replace the @nn placeholder.
That's sort of where it's headed, I think, although LurkingPuppy is right, nothing can be done inside the comment box. Any manipulation, like what's done here with the copy/pasting, has to be done before the pasting.
The other problem with that is cross-page linking when a post spans multiple pages of comments, and it's not possible for the link-creating/linking code on one page to find the permalink on another page. But I have some ideas about that which may work around it.
Lurking Puppy @33: "The @ hack is purely client-side JavaScript."
I see.
"(And so is the add-HTML-tags-on-copy feature on this test blog.)"
...which doesn't work for me, BTW -- it's why I'm still using my standard comment format.
However, if it's possible to hijack the copy-paste feature for comment text, couldn't it also be used for copy-pasting the permalink URL? On IE, I need only right-click on the permalink and select 'Copy shortcut' to get it on the clipboard. It seems like the same client-side script could similarly be used to create the HTML tag for an href around it when I paste it, couldn't it?
Cail Corishev @34: "The other problem with that is cross-page linking when a post spans multiple pages of comments, and it's not possible for the link-creating/linking code on one page to find the permalink on another page."
See above. In short, the script wouldn't need to find the permalink as the user would already provide it via copy-paste.
The only difference between the HTML created by the @ tag and the permalink is below (using your comment #34):
@ tag:
http://vilefacelessmoderator.blogspot.com/2015/09/off-topic-comment-collector.html?showComment=1442435390734#comment-34
permalink:
http://vilefacelessmoderator.blogspot.com/2015/09/off-topic-comment-collector.html?showComment=1442435390734#c7596847340942719272
The string is the same except for the last component. Creating it in the script should be almost the same; only the reference method would need to change. It works on multi-page comments, and it doesn't back-reference incorrect comments when previous posts are deleted.
The only question is what happens if the permalink-referenced comment is itself deleted...? I suspect it would go to the top of the page, but not sure.
If y'all have been up and down and all around on the permalink angle already, feel free to tell me to shut up. It won't hurt my fee-fees....
@ Cail
Heh...just saw in the other thread that you're already brain-deep in this project yourself, so I'll just shut up on my own, now.
FYI, noticed a side effect of the copy/paste hijack - trying to copy URLs and pasting them gets completely borked.
Yeah, people should just use html tags to link; palemoon and firefox have the ability to open pages from the highlighted URL. But it's still an unhappy surprise.
SirHamster (#201) wrote:Yeah, people should just use html tags to link; palemoon and firefox have the ability to open pages from the highlighted URL. But it's still an unhappy surprise.
Do it work?
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted.
DO NOT RESPOND TO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. You will be punished.
Rules of the blog